<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Those Beginning to Study Covenant Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/for-those-beginning-to-study-covenant-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/for-those-beginning-to-study-covenant-theology/</link>
	<description>R. Scott Clark</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich B.</title>
		<link>http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/for-those-beginning-to-study-covenant-theology/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/?p=784#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Driscoll recommends Scott Hahn's book on BT. Hmmmm; me thinks there are many better choices done by folks who believe in sola fide. Driscoll makes me scratch my head, which still has hair on it, BTW. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Driscoll recommends Scott Hahn&#8217;s book on BT. Hmmmm; me thinks there are many better choices done by folks who believe in sola fide. Driscoll makes me scratch my head, which still has hair on it, BTW. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flotsam &#38; jetsam (5.08.08) : EX vilis CATHEDRA</title>
		<link>http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/for-those-beginning-to-study-covenant-theology/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>flotsam &#38; jetsam (5.08.08) : EX vilis CATHEDRA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/?p=784#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>[...] An introductory reading list to covenant theology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An introductory reading list to covenant theology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin P. Glaser</title>
		<link>http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/for-those-beginning-to-study-covenant-theology/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin P. Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/?p=784#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>I would also recommend Lorraine Boettner's &lt;i&gt;The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also recommend Lorraine Boettner&#8217;s <i>The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/for-those-beginning-to-study-covenant-theology/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heidelblog.wordpress.com/?p=784#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this list. 

As one who started in dispensationalism, moved to progressive dispensationalism, then spent a few years in no man's land more based on ignorance of the exegetical arguments for Covenant Theology, Witsius was a godsend. I had always heard the attacks on CT especially the CoW and let them stand, because when I would talk to people about it who held to CT they would not (or could not) give an exegetical argument. It was Witsius' exegetical arguments for the CoW that broke my last resistance.

I look forward to reading your book on Caspar Olevian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this list. </p>
<p>As one who started in dispensationalism, moved to progressive dispensationalism, then spent a few years in no man&#8217;s land more based on ignorance of the exegetical arguments for Covenant Theology, Witsius was a godsend. I had always heard the attacks on CT especially the CoW and let them stand, because when I would talk to people about it who held to CT they would not (or could not) give an exegetical argument. It was Witsius&#8217; exegetical arguments for the CoW that broke my last resistance.</p>
<p>I look forward to reading your book on Caspar Olevian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
