Details here. The HSLDA’s initial response is here.
Top Posts
- A Gentle Rebuke to Brother John (Updated)
- A Baptist Reads RRC and Benefits From It
- On Churchless Evangelicals (Pt 3)
- Calvin500 Schedule, St Pierre Cathedral 5-10 July 09
- For Those Just Tuning in: What is the Federal Vision?
- Audio: Tim Keller and Lig Duncan Discuss the Question of Female Deacons
- URCNA Study Committee Rejects FV (Updated)
- The Heart of the Gospel (and Sola Scriptura Too)
- R. Scott Clark
- Is it Live or is it Memorex?
Recent Posts
- A Baptist Reads RRC and Benefits From It
- The Heart of the Gospel (and Sola Scriptura Too)
- Calvin500 Schedule, St Pierre Cathedral 5-10 July 09
- Lane is Reading William Ames on the HC
- Audio: Tim Keller and Lig Duncan Discuss the Question of Female Deacons
- Exporting Shallowness
- Congratulations to WSC Grads Lenzner and VanderPol
Recent Comments
| dt on A Gentle Rebuke to Brother Joh… | |
| Hattiebear on Audio: Tim Keller and Lig Dunc… | |
| Benjamin P. Glaser on Calvin500 Schedule, St Pierre … | |
| Daniel F on Children at the Lord’s T… | |
| Bruce on A Gentle Rebuke to Brother Joh… |
Blogroll
- Against Heresies
- Between Two Worlds
- Blogorrhea
- Building Old School Churches
- Calvin500
- Christless Christianity
- Confessio Belgica
- Creed or Chaos
- Creideamh (Iain Campbell)
- Daily Confession
- Daily Westminster
- De Regnis Duobus
- Detergere
- Feeding on Christ
- Geneva Redux
- Gospel-Centered Musings
- Green Baggins
- Heinrich Bullinger
- Helm’s Deep
- Heritage Book Talk
- Herman Bavinck
- In Principio Deus
- διαθηκη
- James Durham Thesis
- Ligonier MInistries
- Mars Hill Audio
- Nick Batzig
- Nicotine Theological Journal
- North American Presbyterian and Reformed Council
- Old Life Theological Society
- Oxford English Dictionary
- Pilgrim People
- Pilgrims and Parish
- Pillar and Ground
- Reason From Scripture
- Ref21
- Reformation2Germany
- Reformed Musings
- Restless and Reforming
- Sean Michael Lucas
- The Confessional Outhouse
- The Confessionalist
- The Continuing Story
- The Conventicle
- The Daily Scroll
- The Gordian Knot
- The Melangerie
- The Reformed Reader
- The Riddleblog
- The Upper Register
- URCNA Discussion List
- Wes Bredenhof
- Wes White
- Westminster Seminary California Morning Devotions
- Westminster Seminary California News
- Westminster Seminary California Subscriptions
Facebook Blog Network
Blog Network:
Category Cloud
Academic Stuff American Christianity Calvin500 Calvin Studies Christ and culture Classic Reformed Theology contemporary evangelicalism Covenant, Justification, Pastoral Ministry federal vision Friends of the Heidelblog Heidelberg Catechism Heidelflogging Historical Theology History of Reformed Theology History of the Reformed Churches I Get Questions John Calvin Preaching the Word Recovering the Reformed Confession Reformation Resources Reformed Ethics Reformed Piety Reforming Evangelicalism reforming worship The Mission: Reaching and Teaching Two kingdoms Uncategorized URCNA News Westminster Seminary California WSC Alumni News
Heideltweets
- iPhone up and going AT&T cov good 1 week ago
- Brad and Mark did very well. WSC grad Iwan Baaman is on the floor right now and doing well. 1 week ago
- At classis SWUS (URCNA) in Escondido. Doing the church history exam. The WSC grads are acquitting themselves well. 1 week ago
- The HB passed 700,000 visitors today (since Jan 08) http://heidelblog.wordpress.com Thanks! 1 week ago
- URCNA FV Report Online http://tinyurl.com/qwhz8h 2 weeks ago









3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 6, 2008 at 10:08 am
Dennis W.
Here’s an excerpt of the decision from your link and the L.A. Times story:
“Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,” wrote Justice H. Walter Croskey in a Feb. 28 opinion signed by the two other members of the district court. “Parents who fail to [comply with school enrollment laws] may be subject to a criminal complaint against them, found guilty of an infraction, and subject to imposition of fines or an order to complete a parent education and counseling program.”
That is scary stuff.
I try to follow some of the arguments in the Reformed world about common grace and supporting the government schools. But then others in the Reformed world argue it’s an abdication of responsibility by parents to let the state have so much sway over their children. This court ruling should turn up the heat on that debate, even if it’s overturned.
Parents need a state-approved “credential” to raise (educate) their children? Fascinating implications!
In a bit of irony, our newspaper today featured a Cal Thomas column about the “exodus mandate” to leave the government schools.
March 7, 2008 at 9:26 am
Zrim
“I try to follow some of the arguments in the Reformed world about common grace and supporting the government schools. But then others in the Reformed world argue it’s an abdication of responsibility by parents to let the state have so much sway over their children.”
As a staunch Reformed confessionalist and public education advocate, the only way the latter group has any merit is to assume that the endeavor of education is primarily an affective project and not an intellectual one. But my high view of the creation ordinance tells me that only parents “make, shape and nurture human beings,” not schools. And I consider withdrawl to teach our chidlren the absolute wrong message about God’s world.
Zrim
March 7, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Dennis W.
I’ve been under the weather a couple days and checking out various blogs, something I rarely get a chance to do. Regarding the homeschooling court ruling, some commentators say it doesn’t mean what the L.A. Times suggested.
Through the Gospel-driven blog I noticed there’s a link to scriptoriumdaily, and this has a different take on it:
http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2008/03/07/dont-believe-the-la-times-home-schooling-still-legal-in-california/
Just fyi.